To understand how his triumph came to be, let’s consider three important points: 1. His victory as an interloper drew immediate shock among those unfamiliar with his bona fides - the tongue-in-cheek headline of that night’s Philadelphia Evening Bulletin was “All of Dixie Mourns Andretti’s Victory.” But with hindsight, the surprise and disdain associated with his win dissipated - he’s Mario Andretti, after all - and within the context of the race weekend, his stout performance made plenty of sense when considering what we know to be true. “It was so incredibly rewarding mainly because I didn’t luck into it.”Īndretti made 14 NASCAR Cup Series starts in his life, and the 1967 running of the 500 served as his only top-five finish. Nobody can say that,” Andretti, who led 112 of the race’s 200 laps, said in 2016. It was a legitimate race victory for Andretti, one the auto racing icon appreciates because there’s no “Daytona luck” attached that ignores the narrative and skews the result. ![]() ![]() ![]() What can’t be argued, though, is what the win meant for Andretti’s legacy and for the profile of the race itself - the winner and the event, with time, raised the credibility of one another.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |